Bike snobbery

I generally resist ever blogging about my bike-riding adventures mostly because Bike Snob NYC exists and he says everything I think about while riding my bike so much better than I ever could.

The secret of that blog is that its author is not really a snob at all.  He is just a guy who rides his bike, like many of us do (esp. those of us who live far away from any subway, esp since the last subway fare increase).   He wants cars and bikes and pedestrians to coexist in happiness and safety.  He is not a hysterical activist or a fixed-gear obsessive or a summer-cruising dilettante.  Also, he’s funny.  Whenever I have a bad day on Brooklyn’s potholed, suicidal-pedestrian-filled sidestreets, I turn to his blog for wry, knowing reassurance and often find it.

This recent post is a good example of how BS sees riding a bike as a good way of getting in touch with our worst impulses, over(ahem)riding them, and thereby becoming better at coexisting with our fellow men — even though we might still occasionally give in to the impulse to shame them with a snapshot taken while they idled in a bike lane:

“As anybody who lives in a big city knows, there are times when space-commadeering is acceptable, and there are times when it is unacceptable. There are no hard and fast rules, but like porn, you know unacceptability when you see it. For example, in the subway scenario, a shoulder brush is sometimes unavoidable but a crotch-fondle is never warranted. Similarly, a car entering the bike lane to get around a garbage truck or to parallel park might be the equivalent of a shoulder brush. But sitting in an expensive car and having a cellphone conversation in the middle of a bike lane during the evening rush is just a full-on ball grab.”

Bike snob also taught me to use the term “bike salmon” to describe the jerks who ride the wrong way in the bike lane.  I somehow encountered so, so many of them — among other irritatating things — today, as I made the hop-skip-and-jump trek across a slice of Brooklyn that stretches between my apartment in Clinton Hill and my optometrist in Brooklyn Heights.  This is a terrible ride; there is no possible direct route that doesn’t involve going at least a few blocks on either Fulton Mall or one of its downtown Brooklyn close cousins.  These streets are some video game shit.  A child or someone pushing a child in a stroller (my absolute favorite) is always darting out into your path against the light or in the middle of a block nowhere near an intersection.  Buses and those handicapped-transit vans are constantly trying to run you off the road or run you over.   Then you think you have reached an area of respite because there is a greenway on Clinton Street, but obviously it is full of double-parked SUVs and Fresh Direct vans.   By the time I got to the Cohen’s Fashion Optical on Montague I was so full of near-death adrenaline and rage that I was barely even cold.  I was also warm because I had worn my most disfiguring cold-weather gear, which made it all the more surprising when, as I was strapping it all back on again post-checkup, an old-school Brooklyn macher from old-school Brooklyn macher central — slightly shiny suit, puffy, freshly-cut-looking hair, sunglasses, gleaming loafers –  started hitting on me in the unaggressive, benign way that I actually enjoy.

“You’ve gotta be freezing out here today!”

“Yeah my rule is I won’t ride my bike if it’s under 25,” I told him as I pulled a second pair of gloves on over my first pair.

“I have a rule like that about golf. I don’t play unless it’s over 50 degrees.”

“That’s pretty badass,” I said.

We bantered a little bit more before wishing each other good day and going our separate ways, me on my bike and he in his — ok, to be honest I never notice what kinds of cars people drive.  His fancy car.   I felt really good about humanity for about five minutes, and then near the intersection of State and Hoyt I saw someone unceremoniously open their passenger’s-side door and drop their fast food breakfast garbage out onto the middle of the street.  Those five minutes were nice, though.

Good romance

Emily Mag readers with Cam Jansen-style photographic memories will recall that in September of 2008 I wrote about Dear Old Love, a “a new blog that is dedicated to the bitter, sweet, and strange things that anonymous people wish they could say to their exes.”  “I love how un-cagey its creator Andy Selsberg is about how this breed of blog now essentially functions as a book proposal,” I wrote.  Well: now this blog has become, as Andy had publicly dreamed it would, a “point of purchase novelty book,” and to celebrate that, and Valentine’s Day, there is an event this Wednesday at the 92nd St. Y Tribeca at 6:30 featuring Andy, hilarious comedians Sara Benincasa and Tom Shillue, and singer/songwriter Jeffrey Lewis.  Oh and me, that’s why I’m telling you about it.

This event promises to be varied and funny and not bitter — the description is “This is not ‘anti-Valentines,’ but rather a tribute to people we’ve loved and liked.”  If you have the slightest clue as to what I should read or perform there please let me know, because I truly have not the foggiest.  (I know what I’m doing for Marisa’s March 3rd 92nd St. Y Tribeca awesome party of girlness though and it involves Liz Phair.)

Powerful girls

Hi, there are some books you have to buy this week.

Travel from Olympia (where everyone’s the same) to the Mychygan Wymyn’s Music Festival to the Spice Girls reunion concert via Marisa Meltzer’s revolutionary and engrossing book about how music changed the world for women in the 90s.

Then go on a series of bad dates with Julie Klausner, who is one of the funniest people currently living in the world and on the Internet. I am just flipping through this book right now in search of the line that best sums up its wonderfulness  but there’s one on every page.  It is funny, duh, but also angry and sad and wordly-wised-up in a way that every woman in the world will find irresistibly easy to relate to, but probably especially the women who live in New York, where surveys show that men are 40 times more likely to send all-lowercase emails and texts that say things like, for example, “hi julie. so sorry i’ve been out of touch. the other thing is that i’ve started seeing somebody. anyway, i have your stuff, just let me know where i can drop it off, xo jonathan.”

!!!

Anyway, go to a bookstore and buy both of these.

Death and blogging

Yesterday I had a Google video chat with a group of Portland high schoolers who had been assigned to read and react to “Exposed” by the teacher of their Media Criticism and Analysis class.   As a graduate of Montgomery Blair High School’s Communication Arts Program, which included many classes in Media Literacy that are directly responsible for I would say probably 50% of my (and fellow CAP grad Bennett’s) warped-brainedness — on the first day of high school, I remember, our Media Literacy teacher gave a lecture on the distinction between “skepticism” and “cynicism” that did not stop anyone present from becoming some of the most prematurely jaded consumers of media ever — well, anyway, as a CAP grad, I was naturally sympathetic to these students’ concerns.  Even though they had mostly trashed me on their class-mandated blogs. UPDATE: They had only sort of trashed me in comments, not in blogs or blog posts.   See teacher Jordan Gutlerner’s response, and my response to his response, below.

Many of them had thoughtful responses to the content of the article and saw past the strange fact of its being about the phenomenon that it was enacting.  But a lot of them talked about my “compulsive need for attention.”   Some other students’ assigned blog-post critiques of my article that I have read have been bracketed by introspective posts about the details of their own lives, a juxtaposition that never fails to make me giggle.  Over years of narci-googling, I can’t even tell you how many times I have stumbled across a blog post about what a narcissistic attention whore I am, followed by another post about the details of someone’s breakfast, or marriage, or tastes in music.

Our video chat demonstrated a similar range of thinking-depths about personal blogging and its consequences.   The students had clearly all been assigned to ask me questions, so some of the questions were obviously motivated less by genuine curiosity and more by the need to scribble something assignment-fulfilling during a stolen minute at lunch (eg, “What four people, living or dead, would you invite to your fantasy dinner party?”)  But some of the questions were great.  There was a question about trolls that was particularly great, and another great question about the future of privacy.  And one girl said she had resisted the idea of starting the assigned blog that was part of her classwork, because she hates having other people read what she’s written.  Obvs this sentiment is so alien to me that I was pretty much dumbfounded, but of course what I ought to have said was, you know, not everyone needs to have a blog.  Please, everyone, feel free to not have blogs! I think she ought to have been able to opt out of the assignment, like when the vegans in biology class get to go to the library while everyone else dissects frogs.

Her question pointed up the odd fact that I still can’t seem to properly explain why I write so often in this venue, rather than privately scribbling my thoughts in a notebook or a Word document and waiting until they gel into something “more substantial than a blog post.”  Of course, I do those things — those things eventually added up to a book, though increasingly I have no idea how I managed to pull that off –but more often I do this.  Why?  The answer ultimately might be as simple, and as complicated, as: Knowing that someone — at least one person — is guaranteed to read what I have written is the only thing that gives me the ability to structure my thoughts in a certain specific way.  I guess that means I am “addicted to attention.”   That might be one of the things that it means.

Next a girl in a very cute printed dress asked a question about, has there been a time recently when you experienced something and wanted to write a blog post about it but hadn’t been sure whether you should, or not, and  I found myself going off on a tangent about something terrible that happened when I was in Mexico.

Please stop reading here if you would not like to read about a terrible thing.

I was walking down to the front office of the place we were staying, still wet from the ocean, returning the boogie boards I had borrowed. RC and I were done playing in the ocean and lying on the beach for the day; we were going to take showers and then ride our rented bikes up Tulum’s beach road to go to a yoga class, so I was walking up the gentle rise of white sand that constituted the parking lot of Posada Lamar and just as I crested this hill a small child suddenly darted out into the street that runs parallel to the beach and was hit by an oncoming Jeep.

The child flew through the air and out of the scope of my vision and the Jeep crashed into the sign that marked the entrance to Posada Lamar.

All of this happened in approximately one millionth of the amount of time that it takes to read the preceding paragraph. Then time froze for a second and I froze with it.

But soon time unfroze again,  and again a lot of things happened at once: the women who worked at the hotel came rushing down the hill, dialing the hospital on their cell phones and praying and wailing.   The child’s mother scooped her up off the pavement and carried her to the side of the road where I could see her, and there she held the limp child and rhythmically pummeled her stomach, exhorting her in Spanish to (I think) breathe.  Time had unfrozen but I had not; being frozen, I couldn’t run down the hill and tell her NO DO NOT MOVE SOMEONE WHO MIGHT HAVE A SPINAL INJURY, PUT HER DOWN AND DO NOT MOVE HER, because, as I said, I was frozen and also because I don’t speak Spanish and I was a lifeguard a long, long time ago and no longer trust my ability to perform CPR or know when it is appropriate.  After another few moments that seemed like a few hours the child and mother got into the front seat of one of the many taxis that spend the day zooming up and down the beach road honking at potential fares and zoomed off in the direction of the hospital. I rememered having seen the hospital as we turned off the highway onto the beach road on the day we’d arrived; just a small stucco building, painted white, not much bigger than the average-sized American house where I grew up.  Passing it on the road I had idly wondered what it was like inside, what people were treated for most often in this second-world village/hippie beach resort town; dehydration and food poisoning and bad acid trips, most likely, like in the medical tent of an outdoor rock festival.  And now this child was going there to die, or was maybe — it had looked like it, but I was far away and had no way of knowing — already dead.  “That car was going so fast,” I kept saying, even though to the other people standing around were not reacting to my presence in any way, I was in the background of this scene in exactly the same way as the bougainvillea and the palm trees and the waning afternoon sun and the crashing of the waves behind us.

I waited until the cops came to take away the girl who’d been driving the car, because before they’d arrived (it took them forever) it had seemed like she might leave.  Her boyfriend had arrived on a scooter.  She was crying; at one point she turned her face and puked into the tropical foliage and broken glass at the front of her smashed Jeep.  Good, I thought.  Puke, cryBitch. Murderer.

After the cops came I went and got RC and we stood there for a few minutes as RC quizzed the hotel staff in her high-school Spanish about what was happening, and no one knew, and eventually we went up to our room, a bungalow about twenty feet away from the spot where the accident had taken place — from our porch you could see the wrecked Jeep — and we still had just enough time to make it to the yoga class so because there was nothing else we could do except sit there and watch, we went.

It was the worst yoga class I have ever taken.  The teacher, perhaps used to teaching vacationers he would never see again, did not bother to try to develop any sort of rapport with the students — he didn’t even ask at the outset of class about any chronic conditions or injuries.  And then he taught this motley group of vacationers, whose experience with yoga probably varied from I-have-a-regular-practice to this-is-the-first-time-I-have-done-yoga, an intense and bizarre breathing-centered practice that included warmupless intense hamstring stretches, moves that seemed cribbed from the Bad Romance video — literally no one could follow the class or do even half of the exercises.  The teacher also kept giving instructions that women should begin their twisted poses on a different side than the men.  “Ladies, take your left arm …  Us guys, start with the right arm …” he kept saying.  At one point he slipped up and said “Girls.”

I thought maybe I would walk out of the class but the idea of the awkwardness of explaining my reasons for having walked out to the possible non-English-speaker at the front desk stopped me, and also as terrible of a teacher as this guy was I didn’t want to hurt his feelings.  If someone walked out of a class I was teaching (which hasn’t happened yet, but very probably might!) I would cry for days.  So I didn’t walk out. Finally the asana part of the class, such as it was, concluded with a long guided meditation.  By now the class’s lack of enthusiasm was so apparent that it had even become apparent to the oblivious, terrible teacher, who led the meditation as if he was halfheartedly reading it off an index card (we had our eyes closed so he very well may have been).  We were instructed to imagine a pure white light radiating from us to a person we loved, then a person we didn’t know, then a person we hated, then the entire universe.  I skipped this annoying bullshit and instead thought, “Please let that child be alive.  Please let that child be alive.  Please let that child be alive,” over and over and over and over again.   At some point it occured to me to wonder who, exactly, I was requesting this favor of, and how and why I expected that entity to fulfill this favor when that same entity had allowed the child to be hit by a speeding Jeep in the first place, and then luckily before things got too ontological the class was finally over.

“Any news of the child?” Ruth asked in (to me) impressive Spanish as we walked back through the entranceway of Posada Lamar.  A witchy, heavily eyelinered woman who, it never became clear to us whether she actually worked at Posada Lamar or was just an itinerant masseuse, told us that she had called the hospital and that the child had needed stitches but was otherwise okay.  We walked back up to our room.  “Do you believe her?” I asked RC.

We decided that we were going to choose to believe her.  We went on about our vacation.  I thought about what had happened, I am still thinking about what had happened.  I thought then that I would probably write about what had happened, when I got back to the US and my computer, and I tried to figure out why I was going to do that but I had no answer, and I still have no answer.

I’ll tell you no more lies

So I am having sort of an orgy of my worst Internet tendencies because I’m about to go totally offline — no phone or electricity even! –  for five days starting Friday.  In the interest of Getting It Out Of My System I made a Formspring.me page, where people can ask me anonymous questions. I have only deemed a couple of them too flat-out dumb to answer so far, and some of them have been brilliant, like “What are some songs that you would love to sing at karaoke, but are never ever ever in karaoke machines?” and “What’s your favorite thing about your best friend?”

UPDATE: Thank you for your questions; I’m sorry I couldn’t answer them all. If you are really dying to know something you can email me; I will get back to you after next Weds, when I’m back in the US.

Special sauce

Cooking the Books — Episode 4 — Jami Attenberg from The Awl on Vimeo.

No disaster

img_0575

It’s not hard, we know, but I still think that my mastery of the art of losing is uniquely impressive.  Whenever I buy or am given any big-ticket item, I lose or break it almost immediately.  With rare exceptions, any big expenditure on my part turns out to be a mistake or a waste, usually for reasons I couldn’t have forseen.  Some recent examples:

*That $98 menorah?  Shattered into a million pieces before the congealed wax from the last night of Hanukkah was even dry.  (I’d left it perched precariously on the edge of the radiator.)

*I just spent $700, a scarily high % of my current net worth, on fancy-pants author glamorshots which my publisher is just not that into — a mercy, but an expensive one.

*The lovely Mac on which I type this needed $800/worth of non-warranty-covered repairs a mere 6 weeks after I bought it, because I stuck it in the same bag as a leaky water-bottle as I napped in a flu-addled daze in the Amsterdam airport circa last New Year’s.

*A few weeks before that happened, I lost the first and only expensive item of jewelry I’ve ever owned — perfect, tiny 12-gauge Lori Leven gold hoop earrings — somewhere in the Pacific ocean.

Less-expensive items aren’t spared, either: I shudder to think of how much money I’ve spent on gloves so far this winter.  Which reminds me:  my perfect blue hat, the one the designer doesn’t make anymore, the one I got compliments on every time I wore it — well, it is hiding out in the lost-things dimension too,  having a party with the earrings and all those gloves and several metric tons of hair-ties.

I don’t think I’m more-than-usually irresponsible.  Well, certainly I’m a little irresponsible, but it’s hard to develop responsible tendencies when things just don’t seem to want to be mine.  I could get philosophical  and adopt the belief the universe is trying to teach me non-attachment, or I could get anarchist and adopt the belief that all property is theft.  Mostly, though, I choose a path of least resistance: trying, consciously and not,  to avoid ever having anything nice, because of the high likelihood that any nice thing I own will get lost or destroyed.

All of that is a long way of saying that I avoid owning designer sunglasses, even though I’ve always wanted them — specifically Ray-Ban Wayfarers, which unfailingly make everyone who wears them look like expensive celebrities.  A few weeks before the holidays I was looking online for things to suggest that my Mom buy me for Hanukkah and I decided to find out whether these sunglasses were too expensive to ask for as a present.  (They are.)  But then I got the bright idea to see if there were any used or vintage ones on Ebay for cheaper.  There were!  There were $25 ones.  The seller was in China.  They were almost certainly fake, I reasoned, but the outside chance that they weren’t seemed worth $25, and also, there was an option that I could Buy them Now, and the seller accepted PayPal, so the entire endeavor took about 2 minutes.   Perhaps I ought to add “money in general” to the list of things I am not good at hanging on to.

They came in the mail yesterday.

img_0576

They came in a Ray-Ban box, with a Ray-Ban case and a little pamphlet about their provenance (from Ray-Ban! In Italy!) in a bunch of different languages.  A plastic medallion dangled from the bridge of the sunglasses from a red-and-white string; I dimly remembered seeing something similar in a store once.  The sheer surplus of packaging alone made the glasses seem like a real luxury item. But something — well, some things — seemed off.  The case was stiff.  It didn’t seem to be real leather.   The glasses felt wrong, too — there was something strange about weight of the plastic, the more-pronounced ostentation of the logo.  But if they were fake, why go to so much effort to replicate the manufacturer’s packaging?  The knowing buyer of a counterfeit object isn’t looking for the trappings of the real item, probably,  just that the item itself be convincing enough that he or she will be able to pass it off to his or her friends as real in terms of aesthetic value and the status that the object conveys.

I decided that I was overanalyzing the glasses in a college way.  If I thought about it any harder, I was going to have to get into “what is real,” and I was running late.  They said Ray Ban on them; they were sunglasses; how much realer did I need them to be?

I put them on and rode my bike down Dekalb.  It was midday and I was heading West, so the sun would have been blinding if I hadn’t been wearing shades.  I locked up my bike at Flatbush, put the glasses in my pocket and got on the train.  When I came back to Brooklyn, around 10, it was dark and I didn’t need them, so they remained stashed in my pocket, but I patted myself to make sure they were still there.  I had managed to make it through a day without losing them.

This morning I was tidying up the kitchen and noticed the packaging sitting in my salad bowl.  I picked up the case and peered closer at the gold seal on its lefthand side.

“100% UV Proteltion,” it read.

I am very happy to own these glasses now.  They’re worthless, so I know I’ll never lose them.

Things my brain ate and loved

Instead of lying here in bed at dawn compulsively composing then deleting mind-emails to personal heroes that will strike the exact right tone of non-cloying self-effacement and non-obsequious flattery that will move them to consider blurbing (awful word) my book, I thought I would write about my dinner, and some other things I consumed yesterday.

(A note before I start, though, that the insomniac nature of this endeavor is making me even more sensible than usual to the innate borders of my thinking and writing capabilities.  For weeks or maybe months now a particular quarter-articulated idea has been gestating in my brain and at this point it’s starting to seem like it will remain there, like um some dead unexpelled idea-fetus, forever.  Do you ever feel like this, like you are sort of almost but not quite up to synthesizing the information that’s in front of you?  I’m talking about that frustrating, tantalizing feeling of being almost smart enough to crack the code, but not quite.    Also it seems like stimulants (all my high-strung nerves can handle is a tiny amount of coffee) mask this feeling while depressants simultaneously exacerbate it and, at the right dosages, make you forget the feeling exists.  Maybe my 5am brain is my true brain.  Scary thought.)

Anyway, for dinner a friend and I went to Minetta Tavern.  We were celebrating her raise.  She has been working in book publishing now, on and off but mostly on, for eight years.  She is making more money now than ever before; she is making $36,000 a year, as opposed to the $28,000 a year she made at her first job out of college.    Oh, beautiful city of dreams!    Minetta Tavern was her boss’s recommendation; he said it would probably be busy but they would maybe be able to seat us at the bar.

This restaurant is one of those places whose popularity has coincided with the popularity of ‘Mad Men.’  A famous restaurateur or celebrity comes and refurbishes some “Old New York” dump’s interior and menu while retaining its exterior neon and interior low-ceilinged loucheness and thereby immediately creates an environment where rich and impecunious people can be nostalgic for something they’ve never experienced outside premium cable.  I’m not hating on these places.  I like a dark Marasca cherry in the bottom of my Manhattan; I don’t even mind that my Manhattan costs $14.  But I guess I am not around the fur-wearing, plastic-surgeried, heavily made-up type of restaurant patron often enough that I’m inured to the weirdness of these people’s ways (such as: they don’t seem actually at all to care about food? I saw a man remove the restaurant’s signature burger from its bun and eat it with a knife and fork. He entirely ignored his fries; we are talking about some pretty extraordinary fries here; I wanted to reach over and grab them.  First up against the wall, that guy.)  Also, the last time I was around these people often enough to become inured to their ways, I was on the other side of the being-served equation.  For a few months just before 9/11 (sorry, but that is when it was) I worked at a very “Old New York” steakhouse; at the time I was a vegetarian.  By October I wasn’t, but I no longer worked at the steakhouse.  Thinking of all the delicious beef scraps I could have eaten at staff meals still fills me with regret.

Indeed, there were seats — miraculously, it seemed, since they opened up the moment we walked in — at the bar.  We sat down and the bartenders made little napkin-placemats for us with a flourish, then chatted with us in a leisurely way about what we’d like to eat.  They wore blinding-white uniforms and all looked like off-brand knockoffs of actual Mad Men characters, like, “Roger Sterling-Plated.”    They subtly discouraged the cashmere-sweatered, polo-shirted young men behind us from leaning in over our heads to place their drink orders; this met with mixed results when, at one point, one of these fellows spilled half his martini down the back of the woman sitting next to me.  She was unfazed; she seemed not to feel the beads of moisture through her shirt, or maybe she’d already had a couple of $14 cocktails herself (they are excellent value, potency-wise).

We ate giant chilled shrimp served with artichoke hearts of a bed of “coral vinaigrette.” I belie my secret food non-expertise here when I say that I have no idea what was in this genius quasi-remoulade but it was very slightly spicy, astringent, and so good.  I had been skeptical about my friend’s decision to order the unprepossessing “dressed beets;”  at this point you can get a decent salad of beets and chevre anywhere (and for a long time I made a version of this salad at least weekly at home; it’s weird how we go through phases with foods where we wear ourselves out on dishes like we do with a favorite album).  But this version was different; there was something in the smear of chevre under the beets that gave the dish an unusual dimension of nuttiness, and it wasn’t just because of the walnuts that topped the salad.  Maybe it was walnut oil, or just the quality of the cheese?  Weirdly it reminded me of the “red eye gravy” at Momofuku Ssam which, I almost wish I didn’t know this, is a euphemism for “coffee mayonnaise.”  (I would eat a Dannon-yogurt-sized container of it by itself, probably).

Our main courses, beef marrow bones and steak frites, were very good but unremarkable (except in terms of the quality of the fries, which I have already remarked on).  We had switched to beer at this point.  I pushed through the crowds in the front of the restaurant to make my way back to the ladies’ room.  I didn’t see anyone who I knew enough to recognize as a celebrity but I did see several young women on dates with old men.  Or maybe I’m being unfair and jumping to conclusions and it is somehow Parents’ Weekend at NYU, though I think they are probably still on break.

On the way home on the subway I finished reading “My Lost City” by F. Scott Fitzgerald.  I had never read it before.  (Bennett gave me his copy of “The Crack-Up” over Christmas.)  “My experience of being young and hopeful and then disillusioned in New York City” is a very specific genre of essay, a sort of hard-to-fuck-up genre of essay if you want to be unkind about it, because your audience is already so poised to have “omg me toooo” feelings.  But this essay is also a pinnacle of something besides that genre.

Reading it I had the thought of, it would be funny if the This Recording kids were to put it up with just a few alterations to obscure anachronisms, under somebody else’s byline — it would probably read just like a This Recording essay and everyone would be fooled.  Then I got home to find that they had!  Well, not really.  But this summing-up of the aughts by Alex Carnevale is a very good example of the genre I just mentioned, a great one, actually, and a textbook example, if you needed one, of what the Internet can do (via, basically, just juxtaposing text and music and pictures, I know that sounds pedantic but I’m trying to preach to the unconverted here a little).

Another manifestation of what the Internet can do/ recent obsession is the Firmuhment tumblr.  This is an example of someone who is using Tumblr “wrong” (while still being, or at least pretending to be, caught up in its addicting popularity-contest aspects) but actually using the blog form completely right — counterintuitively, in this case, by refusing to participate in the conventions (linking out, linkability, dashboard-feedability) we now expect of blogs.  And the writing and the feelings, those are good too.

I have also become totally obsessed with the Luxirare food and clothing blog.  This woman “Ji” constantly fields questions from commenters who want to see her obsessive, bizarre, high-concept food and clothing creations, which she photographs with magazine-quality production values, turned into something they recognize as the next level of notoriety — a magazine, a cookbook, a TV show.  She rebuffs them by saying that the Internet is her medium of choice; there are things she can do there that she can’t do elsewhere.  It’s a little weird to me that at least some of these things haven’t been forced upon her a little bit anyway; if I were a fashion or even a New York magazine editor I would make WHO IS JI? a cover story.  But aside from my curiosity about how she affords it all (though I guess she has mentioned, half-jokingly, a trust fund),  I am not remotely skeptical about her strategy.

Look more and see more

My little brother who lives in Asheville stayed with me all last week.  Asheville is only 690 miles away from New York City but it’s not just physical distance that comes between me and my brother; having him around reminded me constantly that I spend so much of my time caring about and knowing about things that people who don’t live in NYC genuinely have no reason to care about or to know about.  Some people who don’t live in NYC know about and care about some of these things anyway; when I meet those people I feel grateful for the conversational common ground but slightly concerned for their mental health.  Like, shouldn’t they probably stop looking at Tumblr and go mountain biking?  (You could make the case, of course, that so should I.  Well, consider it a resolution.)

Anyway, my brother left some things here: a pair of worn-out, whiskey-stained khaki pants, some old tube socks, and issue 27 of Cindy Crabb’s zine Doris.  Somehow I had never read Doris before; this zine, in addition to ‘No More Nice Girls’ by Ellen Willis and both ‘Dusty In …’ recordings, Memphis and London, are all things I discovered over this “winter break” period that I feel like I should have known about for as long as they or I have existed.  It’s that feeling of coming home to a thing you know almost immediately that you are going to love without reservation; the feeling that a thing is at once totally new and somehow familiar. It’s almost like the moment you realize you have forgotten enough of your favorite book or movie or album to read or watch or listen to it again without feeling bored or taking anything for granted, except better because the thing is actually new.

Anyway, here is a part of Doris #27 that I am still thinking about days after reading it:

“I used to worry a lot about getting older — about punks getting older.  Like what would we all do?  We had been taught that to be successful in life you had to go to school, get a job, stick with that job no matter how much it sucked.  You needed health insurance, your own little apartment, your own little girlfriend, you needed to go out to dinner, go out to the movies, buy things to make you and your life prettier.  As punks we said “fuck that.” We were ugly, we were slutty, we lived all together or nowhere at all. We created our own aesthetics. We got everything we needed from what the rest of the world threw out.  Including each other.  We were throwouts.  We found each other in the trash.

But there was a time when my friends started dying, and there was a time when my friends started standing in the back of the room during the shows and then leaving.  And I retreated somewhat too, beacuse there was a part of myself I had to rescue. And now that it was rescued, now that it was flourishing, I wondered what it would be like, out there.”

My brother lives in a group house with a shifting cast of maybe four or five other roommates, some of whom are in couples, and a dog and a somewhat outdoor-only cat.   He spends a lot of time thinking about the problems  of his housing situation; in my experience the more people you live with the better things can be because it forces you to come up with systems and rules if you are going to live by any kind of standards at all, but this doesn’t seem to be the case in my brother’s house.  I don’t know if these people are declared anarchists/punks or if they are just college students who feel like they are going to invent new ways of doing everything that will solve age-old problems via sheer willpower and ingenuity.  Either way it doesn’t seem to be working out.

I live by myself in a one-bedroom apartment with my cat (and, when he’s in town — so like less than 30% of this past year — my boyfriend).  Every day I think about how lucky I am to have this luxury, and how unsustainable — in every sense — this situation is.  Living by my convictions is a luxury in and of itself.  Barring Lotto-type intervention, I will not be able to continue to live like this if I continue defining success Bob Dylan-style.   I would hazard a guess that defining success that way — “What’s money?” — is easier if, like Bob Dylan, you know that you will always have enough of it.

There is also a two-page comic in this issue of Doris titled “Writing,” about Cindy’s insecurities about writing and her struggles to understand whether her methods or habits disqualify her from being “a writer.”   “Was I a fake? What if I was stuck? What was the point?  I thought there had to be an answer, a key.”   She collected tidbits about the habits of famous writers — “Delmore Schwartz liked to write for only one hour a day. Preferably in a crowded cafe.”  “Ursula LeGuin kept a pad of paper on the kitchen table and scratched out sentences between taking care of her kids.”

Eventually Cindy figured out that her questions were “bullshit.”

“The question ‘was I a real writer’ was part of the competitive system I wanted to destroy, where everyone is supposed to strive to do something new that’s never been done, to make a mark on history, to be better than anyone else.  I didn’t want that shit, so why was I looking to those labels for legitimacy?”   She decided instead to hold herself accountable to her own standards — and to ask herself different questions, like, “Why do I write?”

Some of her answers:

“Writing helps me to look more and see more.”

“I write Doris because I believe that in order to change the world fundamentally, we have to challenge ourselves and each other to be brave and alive.   And we have to take our experiences and find the lessons in them and pass on these lessons in a way that doesn’t alienate.”

Also “I believe in care but not a stifling fear or ego driven perfection.”

I thought of a book I’d just finished reading, a book whose publisher had created a national media campaign for it and had printed probably more than a hundred thousand copies.  In an interview the author was asked why she had written the book.  “I wrote this book because I wanted to figure out what was going on in my marriage,” she’d said.

The last line of the Doris comic about Writing is “It helps me to have a project I can finish and put out there to feel connected and not so alone.”

Information about purchasing this zine — it’s $2.75 — or past issues is here.

What I was thinking, is like a New Year’s Resolution

“is to stop getting caught up in my own thoughts, cause I’m like way too introspective, I think … but what if not thinking turns me into this really shallow person?  I better rethink this becoming less introspective thing.”  (via Bennett)